ITR Filing for Founders & Startups: What You Must Know

Mergers & Acquisitions (M&A) are powerful tools for strategic growth, but the process is layered with tax, legal, and compliance intricacies. From choosing the right acquisition method to navigating NCLT approvals, businesses must be well-versed in every step. This guide breaks down M&A structures, tax impacts, and regulatory requirements, making it a must-read for CXOs and corporate strategists.
Choosing the right route for mergers & acquisitions can make or break the deal’s strategic value. From share purchases to court-approved mergers, each method comes with its own tax consequences and regulatory hurdles.
Here’s a quick snapshot of the four key acquisition methods to help decision-makers evaluate the most suitable path forward.
Method |
Key Features |
Tax Implications |
Regulatory Notes |
1. Share Purchase |
Acquisition of a controlling stake through equity |
LTCG taxed @12.50% (u/s 112A, over ₹1.25 lakh) |
Subject to SEBI SAST Regulations for listed entities, FEMA approval if foreign involvement (to the extent applicable) |
2. Slump Sale |
Transfer of a business undertaking as a going concern |
Taxable u/s 50B; computed as per net worth |
Asset-wise, GST implications apply; stamp duty on immovable assets |
3. Court-approved Amalgamation / Merger |
Statutory merger through NCLT u/s 230-232 |
Tax-neutral if conditions of Sec. 47(vi)/(vii) met |
Requires NCLT order, ROC filings,and notices to regulators |
4. Asset Purchase |
Selective acquisition of assets/liabilities |
Item-wise capital gains u/s 50/48; GST applicable |
Input credit available where eligible |
In the dynamic world of corporate restructuring, selecting the right method of acquisition is critical.
Each structure, whether through shares, slump sale, or statutory merger,comes with distinct implications on tax, compliance, and integration. Understanding these nuances helps in optimizing financial outcomes while ensuring regulatory alignment.
Let our experts evaluate your business structure and strategic goals.
Talk to an M&A advisor todayNow, let’s understand how, among all available options, court-approved mergers under the NCLT framework stand out as the most robust and tax-efficient route for corporate consolidation.
In the below section, let’s understand the advantages of NCLT-Approved Mergers and the explanations thereof:
Advantages |
Explanation |
No Capital Gains Tax |
Transfer of assets by the amalgamating company to the amalgamated company is exempt u/s 47(vi). Transfer of shares by shareholders is exempt u/s 47(vii). |
Carry Forward of Losses and Depreciation |
Under Section 72A, if conditions are met, buyer can utilize the seller’s accumulated business losses and unabsorbed depreciation in limited cases. |
Tax Neutrality |
No GST liability on transfer. No immediate tax event for buyer or seller (except stamp duty in some cases). |
Ease of Business Continuity |
Entire business automatically vests without individual asset conveyance, simplifying future operations. |
Important conditions to keep in mind for amalgamation to be tax-exempt:
We help you structure NCLT-approved M&A deals with maximum tax efficiency.
Book a Free M&A ConsultationExecuting a merger requires procedural rigour under Sections 230 to 232 of the Companies Act, 2013. Below is a step-by-step guide:
1. Board Resolutions & Scheme Preparation
2. NCLT Application (First Motion)
3. Notices to Regulators (Sec. 230(5))
4. Shareholders’ and Creditors’ Meetings
5. Petition for Confirmation (Second Motion)
6. NCLT Sanction & Order
7. Post-Sanction Filing and Effectiveness
A merger’s effectiveness hinges not only on legal approvals but also on managing tax and regulatory compliance efficiently:
1. Income Tax Act Compliance
2. GST and Indirect Tax Compliance
While court-approved mergers offer maximum tax and legal efficiency, they also demand meticulous planning and patience. From initial approvals to final integration, the NCLT route follows a defined timeline spread across several regulatory and procedural checkpoints.
Here’s a stage-wise breakdown to help you navigate the journey.
Stage |
Approximate Timeline |
Preparation & Approvals |
Day 0 to Day 30 |
NCLT First Motion |
Day 30 to Day 60 |
Notices & Regulatory Intimations |
Day 60 to Day 90 |
Shareholders/Creditors Meetings |
Day 100–120 |
NCLT Second Motion & Sanction |
Day 130–180 |
Regulatory Filings Post-Sanction |
Day 180–210 |
GST and Tax Transfers |
Day 180–210 |
Integration & Compliance Wrap-up |
Day 210 onwards |
In practice, not every merger needs to go through the full NCLT route. The fast-track merger option under Section 233 is a much leaner alternative, particularly useful for wholly-owned subsidiaries merging into their holding companies or for small companies. When eligible, it saves significant time and cost by avoiding tribunal hearings, relying instead on approvals from shareholders, creditors, and the Regional Director. That said, it’s not a fit for complex restructurings, foreign shareholding, pending litigation, or cross-border elements can knock it out of scope. But for clean intra-group transactions, it’s an efficient option that often gets missed in early-stage structuring discussions.
Ask anyone who's worked on M&A long enough, they'll tell you, getting the deal signed is the easy part. The real challenge starts once the merger is legally closed. That’s where Post-Merger Integration (PMI) becomes make-or-break. Teams struggle to align systems, cultures, and reporting lines; even basics like payroll or vendor contracts get overlooked. Synergies that looked great on Excel often fade in execution. In our experience, the most successful deals are the ones where leadership treats integration as a separate project, with its own budget, timeline, and accountability. PMI isn’t a formality; it’s where value is actually realised. And it deserves just as much boardroom attention as the term sheet did.
Startup Movers brings end-to-end M&A execution, advisory, and compliance under one roof.
Get on a 1:1 call with our experts
Leave a Comment
Comments