India’s service exporters were used to raising an invoice, receiving the overseas payment through a bank and ensuring that the money reached India within the FEMA timeline.
From 1 October 2026, the process has changed for covered service-exporting businesses.
Under the revised FEMA framework, exporters of services must declare the full value of their exports through an Export Declaration Form, commonly called EDF. The declaration creates a structured record that can be monitored through EDPMS until the payment is received, adjusted or otherwise closed.
However, RBI clarified that the reporting requirements do not cover individuals for contracts or transactions of a personal nature. Detailed RBI FAQs are still awaited to clarify the exact boundaries of this relief.
|
Particular |
Requirement |
|
Effective date |
1 October 2026 |
|
Legal framework |
Foreign Exchange Management (Export and Import of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2026 |
|
RBI notification |
FEMA 23(R)/2026-RB dated 13 January 2026 |
|
Form required |
Export Declaration Form |
|
Covered exports |
Software and non-software service exports by covered entities |
|
Normal filing deadline |
Within 30 days from the end of the invoice month |
|
Consolidated filing |
One EDF may cover multiple invoices and overseas recipients for a month |
|
DTA non-software services |
EDF is furnished to the AD Bank |
|
DTA software services |
EDF may be furnished to the AD Bank or STPI |
|
Services exported from SEZ |
Specified authority is the SEZ Development Commissioner |
|
EDPMS reporting |
Completed by the AD Bank or specified intermediary |
|
Foreign-currency realisation period |
Nine months from the invoice date |
|
Invoice and/or settlement in INR |
Twelve months from the invoice date |
|
₹10 lakh relaxation |
Simplifies specified closure and reduction procedures; it is not a general EDF exemption |
|
Individuals |
RBI has clarified that individuals are not covered for contracts or transactions of a personal nature; detailed FAQs are awaited |
|
IEC |
Operational requirement should be confirmed with the AD Bank |
|
STPI registration |
Not automatically required merely because EDF applies |
Confused about the new EDF filing requirements? Connect with Startup Movers for expert assistance with EDF filing, EDPMS reconciliation and FEMA compliance.
The Reserve Bank of India notified the Foreign Exchange Management (Export and Import of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2026 and came into force effective 1 October 2026.
The new regulations superseded the earlier Foreign Exchange Management (Export of Goods and Services) Regulations, 2015, subject to the applicable savings for actions and omissions under the earlier framework.
An exporter of services is required to furnish an EDF to the specified authority. The declaration must state the amount representing the full export value of the services.
The term “services” under the regulations includes software. Therefore, the framework covers both
Under the earlier framework, software exports were covered by the SOFTEX reporting system. However, many exporters of non-software services did not have to submit a separate export declaration where none of the prescribed declaration forms applied.
They were still responsible for receiving and repatriating the export proceeds within the permitted FEMA period.
The 2026 framework changes this position by bringing covered non-software service exports into an invoice-linked declaration and EDPMS monitoring system.
For software exporters, the revised EDF represents a rationalisation or replacement of the earlier SOFTEX-based reporting architecture. For non-software service businesses, it creates a reporting process that many of them did not previously have in a comparable form.
The EDF creates an invoice-level record of the service export. This allows AD Banks and RBI to monitor:
The EDF is therefore not just a form filed once. It begins a compliance cycle that continues until the related export proceeds are realised, adjusted, reduced or otherwise closed in EDPMS.
The written regulations refer broadly to an “exporter of services.” However, RBI officials issued an important clarification on 7 October 2026 after concerns were raised about freelancers, content creators and other individuals.
RBI clarified that individuals are not covered by the reporting requirement for contracts or transactions of a personal nature. Examples discussed during the clarification reportedly included individuals providing tutoring or small software services and receiving payment from overseas.
RBI has announced that detailed FAQs will be issued to resolve remaining questions about the scope and operation of the reporting requirement.
The requirement is particularly relevant for service exports undertaken through:
An individual freelancer or professional should not automatically be treated as liable merely because they receive payment from an overseas customer.
RBI’s clarification indicates relief for individuals undertaking contracts or transactions of a personal nature. However, the exact treatment of every possible situation, including an individual operating a larger commercial activity or a sole proprietorship should not be assumed until RBI issues its promised FAQs.
Individuals should therefore:
Business entities such as companies, LLPs and firms should separately examine their EDF responsibilities and should not rely on the clarification issued for individuals
The specified authority depends on the nature and location of the exporter.
|
Type of export |
Specified authority |
|
Non-software services from the Domestic Tariff Area |
Authorised Dealer Bank |
|
Software exports from the Domestic Tariff Area |
Authorised Dealer Bank or STPI |
|
Services or software exported from an SEZ |
Development Commissioner of the SEZ |
An Authorised Dealer Bank is a bank authorised under FEMA to handle foreign-exchange transactions.
In practical terms, this is generally the bank through which the exporter receives overseas payments. The bank receives the EDF and supporting documents, checks the transaction and reports the service-export details in EDPMS.
No, the exporter furnishes the EDF and supports transaction information to the specified authority.
The AD Bank or other authorised intermediary is responsible for reporting the information on RBI’s system. Under the regulations, the AD Bank must enter the details of a service EDF in EDPMS within five working days of receiving it from the exporter.
The exporter remains responsible for:
An exporter of services must ordinarily furnish the EDF within 30 days from the end of the month in which the service invoice is raised.
Example: Suppose a company raises service-export invoices on:
The normal EDF deadline for these invoices will be 30 November 2026.
The deadline is linked to the end of the invoice month, not 30 days separately from each invoice date.
Yes, an exporter who supplies services to one or more overseas recipients during a month may submit a single consolidated EDF covering those exports.
This means the company may include multiple:
subject to the EDF format and the AD Bank’s operating procedure.
Invoice-level information must still be provided even when the filing is consolidated.
For services other than software, the regulations also permit EDF submission on or before the date of receipt of payment.
Because the relationship between this option and the standard monthly deadline may be implemented differently by banks, exporters should obtain a written procedure from their AD Bank.
Yes, where the exporter is unable to submit the EDF within the prescribed period, it may send a request to the AD Bank explaining the reason for the delay.
The AD Bank may extend the filing period after satisfying itself that the request is reasonable.
The regulations do not prescribe one automatic extension period applicable to every exporter. Any extension period mentioned by a particular bank should be understood as part of that bank’s internal policy rather than a universal rule.
The regulations do not provide a general small-value or turnover-based exemption from EDF filing for an otherwise covered business entity.
This means the ₹10 lakh limit should not be treated as an exemption from preparing or furnishing EDF.
The ₹10 lakh limit applies to certain simplified procedures concerning:
A covered company or LLP should not skip the EDF merely because an invoice is below ₹10 lakh.
The prescribed EDF contains general exporter information and invoice-level service-export information.
|
Exporters should be prepared to provide |
||
|
Type of export: goods or services |
Mode of delivery, including internet where applicable |
Category of exporter |
|
Invoice number and date |
Mode of realisation |
AD code |
|
Relationship between the exporter and third-party payer |
Name and address of the AD Bank |
GSTIN |
|
Exporter’s legal name and address |
Third-party payer details, where applicable |
IEC |
|
Overseas recipient’s name and address |
The date by which the exporter expects to realise the amount |
PAN |
|
Description of services |
Invoice currency and amount |
Net realisable value |
|
SAC or Service Accounting Code |
Contract number and date, where applicable |
Country of the recipient |
|
Deductions, discounts or commissions, where applicable |
||
The form also contains a declaration that the information is correct and that the export proceeds will be received and repatriated within the RBI-prescribed period.
|
Depending on the transaction and the bank’s internal policy, documents may include |
||
|
Completed EDF |
Customer request letter |
Service-export invoice |
|
Purchase order |
Service agreement or contract |
Statement of work |
|
Bank account and AD code details |
PAN, GSTIN and IEC details |
Correspondence with the overseas customer |
|
Payment-platform statement |
Inward-remittance advice |
e-FIRC or equivalent banking evidence, where available |
|
Proof connecting a third-party payer with the overseas customer |
Explanation of any difference between the invoice and remittance amount. |
|
**The exact checklist may differ between banks.
This point requires careful treatment.
DGFT presently states that an Importer Exporter Code is generally not required for the export of services or technology unless the service or technology provider is taking benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy.
However, the prescribed EDF includes a field for the exporter’s IEC.
This creates a practical difficulty for service exporters that were never otherwise required to obtain an IEC.
A service-exporting entity without IEC should:
The existence of an IEC field should not, by itself, be presented as a confirmed legal rule that every service exporter must obtain an IEC. Until RBI or DGFT provides further clarification, the operational requirement should be confirmed with the AD Bank.
No separate STPI or Non-STPI registration has been introduced merely because EDF filing has become applicable.
For services other than software exported from the Domestic Tariff Area, the specified authority is the AD Bank.
For software exported from the Domestic Tariff Area, the regulations recognise:
as the specified authority.
Therefore, a normal service exporter should not assume that it must obtain STPI registration or pay an STPI registration fee only because the new EDF framework has become effective.
The exporter may still have separate STPI-related requirements because of its existing scheme, location, benefits or operating structure. Those requirements should not be confused with the general EDF obligation.
EDPMS stands for Export Data Processing and Monitoring System.
Once the AD Bank receives a service EDF, it must enter the details into EDPMS within five working days. The bank must also report inward remittances and monitor outstanding entries.
In simple terms, the process works like this:
Export invoice → EDF submitted → Entry created in EDPMS → Payment received → Remittance matched → Entry closed
Exporters should regularly reconcile:
Submitting EDF does not automatically close the transaction. The entry generally remains open until the bank is satisfied that the payment has been realised or that the entry can otherwise be reduced, adjusted or closed under the regulations.
Export proceeds for services must generally be realised and repatriated within nine months from the invoice date.
Where the service export is invoiced and/or settled in Indian Rupees, the period is 12 months from the invoice date.
|
Nature of service-export transaction |
Realisation period |
|
Invoiced and settled in foreign currency |
Nine months from the invoice date |
|
Invoiced or settled in Indian Rupees |
Twelve months from the invoice date |
|
Project export |
As per the payment terms of the underlying contract |
Yes, an exporter may request an extension from the AD Bank by explaining the reason for the delay and providing supporting information.
The AD Bank may allow an extension where it is satisfied with the reason.
Exporters should not wait until the receivable becomes significantly overdue. Delayed customer payments should be identified and discussed with the bank before the applicable realisation period expires.
If export proceeds remain unrealised beyond one year from the applicable due date or an extended date allowed by the AD Bank, Regulation 13 may restrict further exports to transactions backed by:
The precise operational scope of this restriction should be confirmed with the AD Bank, especially where the default relates to one particular overseas customer.
For a service-export invoice of up to ₹10 lakh or its equivalent in foreign currency, an EDPMS entry may be closed based on the exporter’s declaration that the payment has been realised, whether fully or otherwise.
The exporter may also submit declarations quarterly for bulk closure of eligible EDPMS entries.
Separately, where there is under-realisation or non-realisation, the AD Bank may permit reduction in the export value based on the exporter’s declaration where the invoice value does not exceed ₹10 lakh.
It does not automatically mean that:
The transaction must still be properly declared, supported and closed through the AD Bank.
Yes, an AD Bank may permit export receivables to be set off against import payables involving:
The set-off must take place within the applicable export-realisation period or an extended period allowed by the bank.
The exporter may need to provide:
A set-off should not be made only through an accounting entry without the AD Bank’s approval.
Yes, an AD Bank may permit export proceeds to be received from a person other than the customer named in the invoice if the bank is satisfied that the transaction is genuine.
This may be relevant where payment is received through:
The exporter may be asked to establish:
Payments received through PayPal, Stripe, Wise or another collection platform should be supported by platform statements and banking records that connect the customer, invoice and amount credited in India.
Use of a payment intermediary does not remove the need to reconcile the export transaction.
Where an exporter receives an advance against a future export, the advance and subsequent export proceeds should ordinarily be routed through the same AD Bank.
The exporter may use another AD Bank after informing both banks about the change.
The exporter should maintain:
Where services are not ultimately provided, the exporter should contact the AD Bank for refund or regularisation of the advance and closure of the EDPMS entry.
No, EDF is a FEMA declaration and export-monitoring requirement.
It does not replace:
A transaction may need to comply separately with FEMA, GST, income-tax and banking requirements.
The meaning of “export of services” and its conditions may also differ across FEMA and GST. Businesses should not assume that filing EDF automatically proves eligibility for zero-rated treatment or a GST refund.
The regulations require an exporter to declare the full export value of services. Where no foreign-exchange realisation is involved, the operational position may depend on the nature of the transaction and the AD Bank’s internal policy.
Some bank-level implementation guidance contemplates a nil-value EDF supported by documents explaining why no payment is receivable.
Businesses providing free services, trial services, group-company support or services without consideration should obtain written guidance from their AD Bank rather than assuming that no declaration is needed.
An AD Bank may have its own onboarding, documentation and transaction-processing charges.
However, RBI requires every AD Bank to maintain a documented internal policy and SOP covering:
The charges must be reasonable and proportionate to the service provided.
The regulations also state that an AD Bank should not levy a charge or penalty merely for a regulatory delay or violation by the exporter. This does not excuse the delay or remove the need to regularise it under FEMA.
Exporters should request the bank’s published schedule of documents, timelines and charges before beginning EDF filing.
Where EDF applies, failure to furnish it or regularise a delayed filing may constitute non-compliance under FEMA.
Depending on the facts, the exporter may face:
Not every delayed filing will automatically result in a penalty. The regulations permit the AD Bank to extend the filing period after considering the reason for delay.
The correct approach is to disclose the delay, provide an explanation and regularise the transaction through the AD Bank.
Covered service-exporting entities should take the following steps:
The new EDF framework is a significant change for covered service-exporting businesses. From 1 October 2026, these businesses must not only raise invoices and receive overseas payments but also ensure that their exports are correctly declared, reported in EDPMS and closed after realisation.
The most important step is to coordinate with the AD Bank. Businesses should confirm the filing method, IEC requirement, supporting documents, charges and EDPMS process while also monitoring RBI’s promised clarification for individuals.
Need support with EDF filing, FEMA compliance, export-invoice tracking or EDPMS reconciliation?Connect with Startup Movers to establish a structured monthly compliance process for your service exports.
Disclaimer: This content is published for informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered legal, tax, financial, or professional advice. Please consult a qualified professional before making any financial or business decisions. Startup Movers shall not be liable for any loss or damage arising from reliance on this content.
Leave a Comment
Comments
No comments yet.
RECENT ARTICLES
GST Portal Introduces Multi-State GST Registration: One Master TRN for Multiple States
CBDT Extends ITR and Tax Audit Due Dates for AY 2026-27
Documents Required for Private Limited Company: The Complete 2026 Checklist
E-Commerce Compliance in India: GST, TDS & TCS
Understand the Different Types of Business Registration in India
Startup India Scheme: Top Government Schemes and Financial Incentives for Entrepreneurs
EPFO Wage Ceiling Raised from ₹15,000 to ₹25,000: Will Your PF Deduction and Take-Home Salary Change?
Depreciation Under AS 10 and Intangible Assets Under AS 26